Sunday, 30 September 2018

Reflection on Growing Creativity - Design Process



Workshop date: Wednesday 26th September (week 10)                          Students: year 7 -10
In this workshop the plan was to go through the design process and design a product. Depending how long it took them I also planned to show them some logo ideas using their devices and perhaps set up them up with some designs for advertising or packaging.

The brainstorm was meant to give the ākonga a few ideas to design a product which they could then pretend to sell. However this became a deeper and the students were focussed on providing their voice. 

The brief: “In paris or small groups discuss a problem to solve: “What are some problems you have being a student at Haeata” This brainstorm delved deep into the students minds! 
It was a challenge for the groups to move onto the next stage. So I had to take on the “role” of designer. I listened to their problems and tried to define the common theme and give them a direction for their solution. This process role modeled good communication and as a designer I had to listen. I also asked questions to clarify what the groups meant. Once I listened I defined the problem and then we could have moved onto the creative “making things” stage if we had time. 

Interesting to note: Charlotte (my daughter, year 7) was the only one who did her own thing and just started making stuff! After watching the video it was all she needed to get started on the design process. 

I think if I was more prepared it would have taken less time. I definitely underestimated how long the brainstorm process would take and 2 groups needed a lot of scaffolding for this part. 

I am wondering if I use these ideas for a follow up workshop and try and encourage the ākonga to be more creative and play with a range of material, creative junk or digital programmes. 

My concern is that the ākonga were bored and won’t want to finish this process and so I might get no students or completely new students turn up.

Ideas I have to improve the delivery of this material:
  • Summarise a problem and present a range of possible solutions
  • Students can use their own as well
  • I can use the data collected from these group
  • This will support ākonga to give the process another try
  • If I include some sketches or programme links then they might be inspired to add their own touches
  • It remains a creative exercise with individualised components 
  • It provides more structure (I think the students need a little more guidance)


Further reflection on using this data:
  • I could use this information to help research or start an inquiry!
  • Perhaps I could turn this into another theme called “grow your student voice”?
  • The student’s voice is very valuable and I know I need to use it to make a difference
  • Perhaps I can use the identified problems to make a hāpori wide contribution?
  • Collaborative problem solving - it’s part of what I learnt in Mindlab on Wednesday - Scrum!

How can I get as many contributions as possible? 
  • GOOGLE FORMS? - advertise on Panui
  • Paper surveys


How do I approach/inform other kaiako about this project?
  • Add to Wunderlist?  
  • Add to Panui?



I like how I summarised the process in a diagram but the hand-out needed more work. 
I had planned to print layout pages from the resource I was using but time ran away on me. 
I need to start preparing workshops earlier to allow more time for unexpected delays. 

It’s not an excuse but I had woken up on Wednesday at 2am and had trouble going back to sleep. By the end of this day I was at Mindlab in Rangiora and I was exhausted, I couldn’t keep my eyes open.

Friday, 17 August 2018

Week 2 @ MINDLAB



Notes from week 2


Leadership and the Key Competencies

Thinking
Relate to Others
Use language, symbols and text 
Manage Self
Participating and Contributing

Holistic, experiential
Whakamana - empowering
Whanaungatanga - positive and collaborative
Manaakitanga - welcoming caring and creative learning environment
Pono - integrity

Professional Relationships - actively contribute, improving & leadership
Discussion:
In a collaborative teaching environment: - there are more warm "fuzzies" and giving each other messages of support and caring about others comes more naturally.

Relationships - have to feel safe and valued when they work with each other.


"Reflective thinking turns insights you get from your experiences"

Digital Footprint - what you post on-line
* How to comment effectively on a blog  e.g. class newsletter

Embracing Change - buy in, quality, up to date with technology, research to justify teaching style/process
Collaborate
Tips for managing time: do homework (readings and videos), workload, pace yourself, keep it  manageable, "MIND LAB" time

Collaborative Rubric from ITL research: 
This is our video for the IN CLASS TASK:


Week 3 Reflections




Digital Reflective Task:


Reflect how you could incorporate a Flipped or Blended approach into your classroom. 

What tools could you use, who could you collaborate with to make it easier?


I already use Google Classroom with my Puna Ako class. I collaborate with the other kaiako however because they have been using it longer than me they are putting more mahi on there compared to me. This includes, student timetables, reflections and tasks.  I am thinking about using Google Classroom for my Kaupapa and/or Mai time workshops. I am going to explore using different digital tools. As I am fairly new to using technology with akonga I feel I need to develop my confidence and my own knowledge. I need to practice before I can implement anything new for others to use. 



Leadership Reflective Tasks:

Reflect on how SAMR and/or TPACK model might help you in planning your DIGITAL 1 assessment 

I'm not sure how I can use these. Everything is just so new to me! I feel I just need to get to grips with what I am doing and what is required of me. So I think I just need to familiarise myself with what they mean! I have made a summary of them for myself so I can refer to them when I am reflecting and assessing myself.



SAMR & TPACK



http://elearning.tki.org.nz/Professional-learning/Teacher-inquiry/SAMR-model 



Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) attempts to identify the nature of knowledge required by teachers for technology integration in their teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted and situated nature of teacher knowledge.
Source: http://tpack.org

http://matt-koehler.com/tpack2/tpack-explained/

At the heart of the TPACK framework, is the complex interplay of three primary forms of knowledge: 
  • Content (CK) "Teachers’ knowledge about the subject matter to be learned or taught".  This includes "knowledge of concepts, theories, ideas, organizational frameworks, knowledge of evidence and proof, as well as established practices and approaches toward developing such knowledge” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Pedagogy (PK) “Teachers’ deep knowledge about the processes and practices or methods of teaching and learning. They encompass, among other things, overall educational purposes, values, and aims."
  • Technology (TK) Knowledge about certain ways of thinking about, and working with technology, tools and resources. and working with technology can apply to all technology tools and resources. 

The TPACK approach goes beyond seeing these three knowledge bases in isolation. The TPACK framework goes further by emphasizing the kinds of knowledge that lie at the intersections between three primary forms: 
  • Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) The teacher interprets the subject matter, and transforms it in various ways. The teacher represents the knowledge and adapts and alters the learning material to alternative conceptions to suit the students’ prior knowledge. 
  • Technological Content Knowledge (TCK)     An understanding of the manner in which technology and content influence and constrain one another. Teachers need to master more than the subject matter they teach; they must also have a deep understanding of the manner in which the subject matter (or the kinds of representations that can be constructed) can be changed by the application of particular technologies. Teachers need to understand which specific technologies are best suited for addressing subject-matter learning in their domains and how the content dictates or perhaps even changes the technology—or vice versa” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009). 
  • Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) “An understanding of how teaching and learning can change when particular technologies are used in particular ways. This includes knowing the pedagogical affordances and constraints of a range of technological tools as they relate to disciplinarily and developmentally appropriate pedagogical designs and strategies” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).

  • Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) “Underlying truly meaningful and deeply skilled teaching with technology, TPACK is different from knowledge of all three concepts individually. Instead, TPACK is the basis of effective teaching with technology, requiring an understanding of the representation of concepts using technologies; pedagogical techniques that use technologies in constructive ways to teach content; knowledge of what makes concepts difficult or easy to learn and how technology can help redress some of the problems that students face; knowledge of students’ prior knowledge and theories of epistemology; and knowledge of how technologies can be used to build on existing knowledge to develop new epistemologies or strengthen old ones” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).

Week 4 Mind Lab

Leadership Task:

Read the article on the portal "Research-Informed Teaching of Adults: A Worthy Alternative to Old Habits and Hearsay?" - in particular the first five and a half pages and the conclusion on page 15. 
Then consider whether teaching needs to be Research-Informed

  1. research-led, where the curriculum content is based on the research interests of teachers
  2. research-oriented, where the process of learning content is seen as important as the content itself and hence, an emphasis on learning inquiry skills
  3. research-based, where the curriculum is based on inquiry-based activities rather than acquisition of content
  4. research-informed teaching, which consciously draws on systematic inquiry into the teaching and learning process itself. 
  • Teacher's philosophy may not be enough and their practice may not align with their beliefs despite their best intentions. 
  • Teachers have been taught in traditional ways so they are socialised to teaching in a teacher directed style. 
  • Teacher's may use their experiences rather than research to justify their practice.  
  • There are alternatives to RIT such as we could identify effective teachers but what would be the criteria? 
  • Learners perspective, peer assessment and learning based could also be used. 
  • The benefits of using research is to be able to use teaching ideas from qualitative and/or quantitive data. 
  • This means that the teacher would have to be impartial when assessing the effectiveness of our own and others teaching practice. 

If so, what parts of the article should you keep in mind when working on your assignments?
For my own assignment I need to collect data which is following an unbiased inquiry process. I need to collect data from a variety of sources.

Digital Task:


View the video 'Top 10 Learning Theories for Digital and Collaborative Learning'. 

Consider the differences between constructivism and constructionism and how collaboration relates to both. 
Create a diagram that captures your ideas on a single slide, then record a screencast of you explaining your diagram (2 mins max). 
You'll show this to another student in class, so you just need it saved on your device.



Collaborative, Constructionist and Constructivist Learning


The Modern Learners Lens - Thursday 16th August



The Modern Learners Lens

Ākonga are capable of producing works of amazing beauty and impact. 

Access to learning has significantly changed. 

Technologies like podcasts and Youtube are being used to solve real problems e.g. electric shoes.

Culture needs to support this change in learning

New Zealand Schools are taking up the challenge of Modern Learning, leading the example for other schools world wide. Leading and being a part of change. Political climate and autonomy of us as teachers.

Harsh understanding of the difficulty of change. The shift hasn't been consistent across the school but impressed with our short journey. 

The clarity of the shared vision and common purpose (including language for staff, students and community). A clear rationale for doing what we do and articulate this. e.g. marketing campaign. Research - evidence is important to combat criticism. Conform to the assessment but its not our focus e.g. dispositions rather than standards.


A LEARNING CULTURE!!!!!!

Biggest barrier to this is communication to the wider community e.g newsletters, public, media, politicians. Experience of people who have done this. Students coming home and talking to their parents.

"IT" is - when play is valued, self directed, passion leading learning, agency is enabled, experiential learning, empowered. Working from who the ākonga are not making them fit in the model.  Content is not the point. Kids are naturally curious.

All ākonga are capable and would benefit but they should have the opportunity to do it.  Ākonga are the ones who will push back the most because they are used to the system.

The value has changed for the kaiako and kura. Powerful but different - teachers role e.g. inspiring and caring.

"TALENT SEARCH" Identify what they love but also give chances to explore a variety of different experiences.

BARRIER - confidence, living the belief, historical narrative          
 SUCCESS - flow, social, choice and agency, do your ākonga want to keep learning

Papert Quotes:"Every maker of video games knows something that the makers of curriculum don't seem to understand. You'll never see a video game being advertised as being easy. Kids who do not like school will tell you it's not because it's too hard. It's because it's--boring"
"The role of the teacher is to create the conditions for invention rather than provide ready-made knowledge."
Equity - not predetermined outcomes not the "same" education, not prescribed. 
Deeper learner: what they want,  how they want and when they want
Write down and publish their beliefs. e.g High Tech High 
Teacher Directed - explicit instruction (can be a useful tool) application is the important part
Piaget "act of teaching - denies chance for discovery"
Curriculum - strategy brought out when ākonga need it. 
Used at the right place at the right time so the ākonga still have ownership of it.
Network of conversations! 

Key Competencies


My reflection on Key Competencies and my teaching Practice


I have spent just over a term teaching at Haeata Community Campus. I work with year 7 - 10 ākonga as part of the Kōrepo team.  Before this I was an Early Childhood Teacher for many years. My academic background is a degree in  Geography and Art Theory. I also have Graduate Diplomas of Teaching and Learning in Secondary and ECE. My main teaching subject was Geography and Social Studies, with Art History and Graphics and Design.

I am relatively new to using the terminology of Key Competencies but in ECE we use Dispositions. However these align fairly well. At Haeata we also use different names for our values and dispositions. 

Thinking

"Thinking is about using creative, critical, and metacognitive processes to make sense of information, experiences, and ideas. These processes can be applied to purposes such as developing understanding, making decisions, shaping actions, or constructing knowledge. Intellectual curiosity is at the heart of this competency. Students who are competent thinkers and problem-solvers actively seek, use, and create knowledge. They reflect on their own learning, draw on personal knowledge and intuitions, ask questions, and challenge the basis of assumptions and perceptions."

Metacognitive Processes – Learning to Learn

Learners use metacognition to monitor the progress of their learning and to think about their own thinking and learning processes.
There is a close relation between cognition (thinking and learning) and metacognition (thinking about thinking and learning). Metacognition means being aware of how cognition is occurring.
English Language Learning Progressions: Introduction, Ministry of Education, 2007, page 17

Creative Processes - connecting ideas in a new way

  1. Gather new material. At first, you learn. During this stage you focus on 1) learning specific material directly related to your task and 2) learning general material by becoming fascinated with a wide range of concepts.
  2. Thoroughly work over the materials in your mind. During this stage, you examine what you have learned by looking at the facts from different angles and experimenting with fitting various ideas together.
  3. Step away from the problem. Next, you put the problem completely out of your mind and go do something else that excites you and energizes you.
  4. Let your idea return to you. At some point, but only after you have stopped thinking about it, your idea will come back to you with a flash of insight and renewed energy.
  5. Shape and develop your idea based on feedback. For any idea to succeed, you must release it out into the world, submit it to criticism, and adapt it as needed.
"The creative process is the act of making new connections between old ideas. Thus, we can say creative thinking is the task of recognizing relationships between concepts."  5 steps to creative process James Clear

Critical Processes

1. Identification


  • identify the situation or problem 
  • factors that may influence it 
  • then go deeper into an issue and its possible solutions.
Then ask these Questions:
  • Who is doing what?
  • What seems to be the reason for this happening?
  • What are the end results and how could they change? 

2. Research

Arguments are meant to be persuasive but they also need to use independent and valid research. Use good sources that have "peer" reviewed and academic rather than popular posts.

3. Identifying biases

Be aware that bias exists and try to be objective. When evaluating information or an argument, ask yourself the following:
  • Who does this benefit?
  • Does the source of this information appear to have an agenda?
  • Is the source overlooking, ignoring or leaving out information that doesn’t support its beliefs or claims?
  • Is this source using unnecessary language to sway an audience’s perception of a fact?

4. Inference


  • Sometimes we need to assess the information we have and draw our own conclusions. 
  • An inference is an educated guess. 
  • Making correct guesses is more likely if you gather multiple sources or types of informations. 
  • When faced with a new scenario or situation to evaluate, first try skimming for clues—things like headlines, images and prominently featured statistics—and then make a point to ask yourself what you think is going on.

5. Determining relevance

What information is the most important to consider? Have a clear idea of what needs to be figured out. Use your end goal to guide you to find what is relevant. Make a list of priorities.

6. Curiosity

Don't take everything you see at face value. We increasingly need to have critical thinking. Ask open-ended questions about the things you see and follow up this by inquiring further information.
These ideas are summarised from this site: Critical Thinking Process
Using language, symbols and text



"Using language, symbols, and texts is about working with and making meaning of the codes in which knowledge is expressed.
Languages and symbols are systems for representing and communicating information, experiences and ideas.
People use languages and symbols to produce texts of all kinds: written, oral/aural, and visual; informative and imaginative; informal and formal; mathematical, scientific, and technological.
Students who are competent users of language, symbols, and texts can interpret and use words, number, images, movement, metaphor, and technologies in a range of contexts.
They recognise how choices of language, symbol, or text affect people’s understanding and the ways in which they respond to communications.
They confidently use ICT (including, where appropriate, assistive technologies) to access and provide information and to communicate with others."

Relating to Others

"Relating to others is about interacting effectively with a diverse range of people in a variety of contexts. This competency includes the ability to listen actively, recognise different points of view, negotiate, and share ideas. Students who relate well to others are open to new learning and able to take different roles in different situations. They are aware of how their words and actions affect others. They know when it is appropriate to compete and when it is appropriate to co-operate. By working effectively together, they can come up with new approaches, ideas, and ways of thinking"


Manage Self

"This competency is associated with self-motivation, a “can-do” attitude, and with students seeing themselves as capable learners. It is integral to self-assessment.Students who manage themselves are enterprising, resourceful, reliable, and resilient. They establish personal goals, make plans, manage projects, and set high standards. They have strategies for meeting challenges. They know when to lead, when to follow, and when and how to act independently."

Participating and Contributing

"This competency is about being actively involved in communities. Communities include family, whānau, and school and those based, for example, on a common interest or culture. They may be drawn together for purposes such as learning, work, celebration, or recreation. They may be local, national, or global. This competency includes a capacity to contribute appropriately as a group member, to make connections with others, and to create opportunities for others in the group. Students who participate and contribute in communities have a sense of belonging and the confidence to participate within new contexts. They understand the importance of balancing rights, roles, and responsibilities and of contributing to the quality and sustainability of social, cultural, physical, and economic environments."

This information comes from the Mindab course and they got their information from this site:  NZ Curriculum Key Dispositions MOE